Standings
CIBACOPA · 2025Current CIBACOPA 2025 standings with 10 teams. Astros leads the table with 29 points after 36 matches, followed by Angeles CDMX on 26 points. The table shows wins, losses, scoring, and win percentage — essential for pre-match betting analysis.
| # | Team | Played | Won | Lost | Points For:Points Against | Point Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | 29 | 7 | 3548:3125 | +423 | |
| 2 | 36 | 26 | 10 | 3923:3657 | +266 | |
| 3 | 36 | 24 | 12 | 3282:3111 | +171 | |
| 4 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 3373:3349 | +24 | |
| 5 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 3218:3218 | 0 | |
| 6 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 3040:3118 | -78 | |
| 7 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 3172:3217 | -45 | |
| 8 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 3291:3392 | -101 | |
| 9 | 36 | 14 | 22 | 3191:3330 | -139 | |
| 10 | 36 | 5 | 31 | 3043:3564 | -521 |
Final21/06/2025–02/07/2025
Semi-finals07/06/2025–18/06/2025
Wed 18/06Angeles CDMX
82–97
Zonkeys de Tijuana
Tue 17/06Astros
87–78
Halcones de Obregon
Tue 17/06Angeles CDMX
78–71
Zonkeys de Tijuana
Sat 14/06Halcones de Obregon
70–73
Astros
Sat 14/06Zonkeys de Tijuana
109–87
Angeles CDMX
Thu 12/06Halcones de Obregon
76–93
Astros
Thu 12/06Zonkeys de Tijuana
87–115
Angeles CDMX
Wed 11/06Halcones de Obregon
92–91
Astros
Wed 11/06Zonkeys de Tijuana
88–93
Angeles CDMX
Sun 08/06Angeles CDMX
78–97
Zonkeys de Tijuana
Sun 08/06Astros
84–86
Halcones de Obregon
Sat 07/06Angeles CDMX
98–107
Zonkeys de Tijuana
Sat 07/06Astros
83–73
Halcones de Obregon
Quarter-finals29/05/2025–03/06/2025
Team Stats
Side-by-side performance comparison of all 10 teams in the CIBACOPA. Astros leads with 29 wins this season. The colour-coded heatmap highlights wins, losses, scoring, scoring difference, and win percentage — making it easy to spot the strongest and weakest teams at a glance for betting analysis.
Top Scoring Teams
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Points For | Points Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played36 | 29 | Lost7 | Points For3548 | Points Against3125 | Avg W34.0 | Avg L14.0 | |
| 2 | Played36 | 26 | Lost10 | Points For3923 | Points Against3657 | Avg W25.0 | Avg L20.0 | |
| 3 | Played36 | 24 | Lost12 | Points For3282 | Points Against3111 | Avg W19.0 | Avg L23.0 | |
| 4 | Played36 | 18 | Lost18 | Points For3373 | Points Against3349 | Avg W14.0 | Avg L23.0 | |
| 5 | Played36 | 18 | Lost18 | Points For3218 | Points Against3218 | Avg W9.0 | Avg L24.0 | |
| 6 | Played36 | 16 | Lost20 | Points For3040 | Points Against3118 | Avg W34.0 | Avg L17.0 | |
| 7 | Played36 | 15 | Lost21 | Points For3172 | Points Against3217 | Avg W33.0 | Avg L12.0 | |
| 8 | Played36 | 15 | Lost21 | Points For3291 | Points Against3392 | Avg W14.0 | Avg L26.0 | |
| 9 | Played36 | 14 | Lost22 | Points For3191 | Points Against3330 | Avg W20.0 | Avg L22.0 | |
| 10 | Played36 | 5 | Lost31 | Points For3043 | Points Against3564 | Avg W7.0 | Avg L28.0 |
API data: 12 May 2026