Today's Matches
FIBA Europe CupLive scores, upcoming kick-offs, and finished results for today. Data refreshes automatically so you never miss a moment.
Finished Today
1 matchesPlayoffs
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Finals
Standings
| # | Team | Played | Won | Lost | Points For:Points Against | Point Diff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 507:424 | +83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 465:439 | +26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 478:509 | -31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 412:490 | -78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 535:457 | +78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 504:476 | +28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 497:544 | -47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 456:515 | -59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 505:466 | +39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 516:439 | +77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 486:508 | -22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 448:542 | -94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 531:468 | +63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 539:451 | +88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 468:541 | -73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 482:560 | -78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 617:415 | +202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 525:435 | +90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 456:540 | -84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 382:590 | -208 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group F | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 527:513 | +14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 502:488 | +14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 563:526 | +37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 454:519 | -65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group G | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 535:461 | +74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 535:467 | +68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 523:500 | +23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 428:593 | -165 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 571:449 | +122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 514:477 | +37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 514:519 | -5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 426:580 | -154 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group I | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 552:488 | +64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 522:532 | -10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 495:539 | -44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 541:551 | -10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group J | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 494:449 | +45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 501:500 | +1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 463:481 | -18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 477:505 | -28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results
FIBA Europe Cup · 50Team Stats
Betting Insights
2025Season Trends
Season-by-season comparison across 2 seasons of the FIBA Europe Cup, with 2025 highlighted. The current season averages — combined scoring per match across 190 matches played. Columns cover home win % and away win % — use year-on-year trends to spot if the league is becoming higher or lower scoring and calibrate your betting strategy accordingly.
Top Scoring Teams
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Points For | Points Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For507 | Points Against424 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 2 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For535 | Points Against457 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 3 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For505 | Points Against466 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 4 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For531 | Points Against468 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 5 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For617 | Points Against415 | Avg W6.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 6 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For525 | Points Against435 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 7 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For527 | Points Against513 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 8 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Points For571 | Points Against449 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 9 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For465 | Points Against439 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 10 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For516 | Points Against439 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 11 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For539 | Points Against451 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 12 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For502 | Points Against488 | Avg W3.0 | Avg L3.0 | |
| 13 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For535 | Points Against461 | Avg W6.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 14 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For535 | Points Against467 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L5.0 | |
| 15 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For514 | Points Against477 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 16 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Points For552 | Points Against488 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 17 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For504 | Points Against476 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L4.0 | |
| 18 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For486 | Points Against508 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L4.0 | |
| 19 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For563 | Points Against526 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 20 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For523 | Points Against500 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 21 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For522 | Points Against532 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 22 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For495 | Points Against539 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 23 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For494 | Points Against449 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 24 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For501 | Points Against500 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 25 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For463 | Points Against481 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 26 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Points For477 | Points Against505 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 27 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For478 | Points Against509 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 28 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For497 | Points Against544 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 29 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For456 | Points Against515 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 30 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For468 | Points Against541 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L5.0 | |
| 31 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For514 | Points Against519 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 32 | Played6 | 2 | Lost4 | Points For541 | Points Against551 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 33 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For412 | Points Against490 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L6.0 | |
| 34 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For482 | Points Against560 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 35 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For456 | Points Against540 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 36 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For382 | Points Against590 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L4.0 | |
| 37 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For428 | Points Against593 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 38 | Played6 | 1 | Lost5 | Points For426 | Points Against580 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L6.0 | |
| 39 | Played6 | 0 | Lost6 | Points For448 | Points Against542 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 40 | Played6 | 0 | Lost6 | Points For454 | Points Against519 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L6.0 |
FIBA Europe Cup — Past Seasons
Browse 8 archived seasons of the FIBA Europe Cup, from 2020 to 2025. Each season page includes full standings, top scorers, and match results — useful for comparing historical performance and identifying long-term betting patterns.
History 19 Mar 2026
The FIBA Europe Cup was created in 2015 as part of FIBA's restructuring of European club competition, designed to provide a third-tier alternative to the EuroLeague and EuroCup whilst maintaining competitive integrity. The competition was established to accommodate growing numbers of ambitious clubs across Europe seeking continental competition. Since its inaugural 2015/16 season won by Fraport Skyliners, the competition has expanded significantly, with the regular season format evolving from initial group configurations to the current system of 40 teams divided into 10 groups of four clubs. The competition has established itself as a crucial development platform, with multiple champions subsequently graduating to higher-tier competitions, demonstrating its role in European basketball's competitive hierarchy.
- —2015 — Fraport Skyliners won the inaugural FIBA Europe Cup title
- —2018 — Umana Reyer Venezia defeated Sidigas Scandone Avellino in an all-Italian final
- —2019 — Dinamo Sassari claimed the title in another all-Italian final against s.Oliver Wurzburg
- —2020 — Season cancelled due to COVID-19 pandemic
- —2022 — Bahcesehir College won their first title, beginning Turkish dominance in the competition
- —2024 — NINERS Chemnitz defeated Bahcesehir College in a thrilling one-point final
- —2025 — Bilbao Basket won the title, becoming Spain's most successful FIBA Europe Cup team with two championships
Competition Format 19 Mar 2026
The FIBA Europe Cup regular season comprises 40 teams divided into ten groups of four clubs, with each team playing six games (home and away) within their group. The top two teams from each group advance to the knockout playoffs, where they compete in a two-legged quarter-final format. The semi-finals and finals are also contested over two legs, with aggregate scoring determining advancement. Teams earn two points for a win and one point for a loss, creating a 12-point maximum per group. The two-legged playoff format ensures competitive balance and provides teams with opportunities to overcome first-leg deficits through home-court advantage.
Records 19 Mar 2026
Trae Golden holds the single-game scoring record with 41 points for Bahcesehir College, set during the 2019/20 season.
Analysis 19 Mar 2026
Current Season Analysis (2025/26)
The 2025/26 FIBA Europe Cup season has progressed to the quarter-final stage, with the regular season revealing a highly competitive landscape across all ten groups. Bilbao and Peristeri emerged as the dominant forces in Group E, both securing 5-1 records with Bilbao's 617 points for demonstrating exceptional offensive firepower—the highest scoring output across all groups. Murcia (Spain), Rostock (Germany), CSM Oradea (Romania), Cedevita Junior (Croatia), Basket Zaragoza (Spain), and PAOK (Greece) completed the list of group winners, each maintaining perfect or near-perfect records to secure top seeding for the knockout stages.
The competitive depth of the 2025/26 season is underscored by the emergence of multiple strong challengers. Petkim Spor of Turkey, finishing second in Group C with a 4-2 record, and BC Prievidza of Slovakia, securing 4-2 in Group D, represent the competition's expanding quality beyond traditional powerhouse nations. Szombathely (Hungary) and Sporting CP (Portugal) also demonstrated their credentials by finishing second in their respective groups, indicating growing parity across European basketball. The quarter-final lineup reflects this balance, with Spanish clubs (Murcia, Bilbao, Zaragoza) maintaining strong representation alongside emerging challengers from Germany, Romania, Greece, and Croatia.
Notably, Bilbao's 105–51 demolition of Brno represents the season's most dominant performance, highlighting the gulf in quality between elite competitors and mid-tier participants. Conversely, the narrow margins in several groups—where fourth-placed teams finished just 3-4 points behind third-placed clubs—underscore the competitive intensity throughout the regular season. The quarter-final matchups promise compelling basketball, with Murcia facing Reggiana and PAOK meeting their Greek rivals in what could prove defining encounters for continental progression.
The 2025/26 season has also demonstrated the competition's evolution as a genuine platform for player development. Multiple clubs have utilised FIBA Europe Cup participation to integrate younger talent alongside experienced professionals, creating a competitive environment that mirrors higher-tier competitions. The regular season's tight finishes and high-scoring encounters suggest that the finals will likely be equally competitive, with no clear favourite emerging from the group stage results.
Competition Evolution and Global Standing
Since its establishment in 2015, the FIBA Europe Cup has evolved from a nascent third-tier competition into a respected continental tournament attracting significant investment and media attention. The competition's structure—accommodating 40 teams from nearly 40 European nations—reflects basketball's growth across the continent whilst maintaining competitive standards. The presence of clubs from diverse basketball markets, including Spain, Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Turkey, Greece, and Scandinavia, demonstrates the competition's truly continental reach.
The championship record reveals fascinating patterns in European basketball dominance. Spain and Italy have each produced two champions, with Bilbao Basket and Fraport Skyliners (Germany) establishing themselves as successful franchises. The emergence of Bahcesehir College (Turkey) as a two-time finalist and title winner signals Turkish basketball's growing ambitions, whilst the success of NINERS Chemnitz (Germany) in 2024 demonstrates German clubs' sustained competitiveness. The competition has proven instrumental in developing players who subsequently achieved success in higher-tier competitions, validating its role within European basketball's ecosystem.
Format and Competitive Integrity
The FIBA Europe Cup's current format represents a refinement of earlier structures, designed to balance accessibility with competitive integrity. The ten-group configuration ensures that clubs compete primarily against geographically proximate opponents, reducing travel costs and logistical complexity whilst maintaining competitive standards. The two-point system for victories—rather than the three-point system used in some European competitions—reflects the competition's developmental philosophy, where competitive balance is prioritised over maximising point differentials.
The two-legged playoff format, particularly in the finals, has produced some of the competition's most memorable moments. The 2024 final between NINERS Chemnitz and Bahcesehir College, decided by a single aggregate point (180-179), exemplified the format's capacity to create dramatic finishes. This structure also provides teams with strategic flexibility, allowing second-leg comebacks through home-court advantage—a feature that has proven decisive in numerous playoffs throughout the competition's history.
Notable Champions and Competitive Trends
The nine different champions across ten seasons (excluding the 2020 cancellation) indicate the competition's competitive depth and unpredictability. Fraport Skyliners' 2016 inaugural victory established German excellence in the competition, a standard maintained by NINERS Chemnitz's dramatic 2024 triumph. Anwil Wloclawek's 2023 victory demonstrated Polish basketball's capabilities, whilst Ironi Ness Ziona's 2021 triumph represented Israeli basketball's continental ambitions—the latter particularly significant given Israel's geographical distance from traditional European basketball centres.
The emergence of Bilbao Basket as a two-time champion reflects Spanish basketball's sustained investment in club development. The club's 2024 and 2025 victories, particularly the 2025 triumph over PAOK, established Spain as the competition's most successful recent nation. The 2024 final's dramatic conclusion—NINERS Chemnitz defeating Bahcesehir College by one point—demonstrated that competitive intensity reaches its apex in the finals, where defensive excellence and clutch performances determine outcomes.
Player Development and Career Pathways
The FIBA Europe Cup has established itself as a crucial development platform within European basketball's hierarchy. The competition attracts experienced professionals seeking European exposure, younger players developing their craft, and mid-career athletes maintaining competitive standards. The presence of clubs from diverse basketball cultures—from Iberian Spain to Baltic Estonia, from Mediterranean Greece to Central European Slovakia—creates a genuinely multicultural competition.
Trae Golden's single-game scoring record of 41 points, set whilst playing for Bahcesehir College, exemplifies the level of individual excellence the competition attracts. Multiple FIBA Europe Cup alumni have subsequently progressed to EuroLeague careers, validating the competition's role as a stepping stone within European basketball's competitive pyramid. The 2025/26 season's participation of clubs like Peristeri, Sporting CP, and Szombathely—all with aspirations of continental progression—demonstrates the competition's continued relevance to ambitious clubs.
Broadcast and Commercial Developments
The FIBA Europe Cup's commercial profile has expanded significantly since its inception. Broadcast coverage through FIBA's digital platforms and regional sports networks has extended the competition's reach across European markets. The participation of clubs from major basketball nations ensures consistent media interest, particularly in Spain, Germany, Italy, France, and Greece, where domestic broadcasters provide regular coverage.
The competition's role within FIBA's broader European strategy positions it as a sustainable long-term investment. Unlike some third-tier competitions that struggle with sustainability, the FIBA Europe Cup benefits from FIBA's institutional support and the competitive legitimacy provided by its position within the official European basketball hierarchy. Sponsorship opportunities and media rights deals continue to develop, particularly as clubs recognise the competition's value for player development and brand building.
Future Outlook and Competitive Prospects
The 2025/26 season demonstrates that the FIBA Europe Cup remains highly competitive and unpredictable. The emergence of clubs like Bilbao, PAOK, and Peristeri as consistent contenders, alongside the established strengths of German and Italian basketball, suggests that future championships will remain competitive. The quarter-final stage has already begun to reveal which clubs possess the mental resilience and tactical discipline required for two-legged playoff basketball.
The competition's future appears secure, with FIBA committed to maintaining it as a core component of European basketball's competitive structure. The 2025/26 season's high-scoring encounters and competitive group finishes indicate that the competition continues to attract quality participants and produce entertaining basketball. As European basketball continues to develop globally, the FIBA Europe Cup will likely maintain its role as a crucial pathway for ambitious clubs seeking continental recognition and players pursuing professional advancement.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many teams compete in the FIBA Europe Cup?
The FIBA Europe Cup features 40 teams divided into 10 groups of 4 clubs each. The top two teams from each group advance to the knockout playoffs.
What is the FIBA Europe Cup's position in European basketball?
The FIBA Europe Cup is the third-tier continental competition in Europe, positioned below the EuroLeague and EuroCup. It serves as a crucial development pathway for ambitious clubs.
Who has won the most FIBA Europe Cup titles?
Bilbao Basket of Spain holds the record with 2 FIBA Europe Cup championships (2024 and 2025), though nine different clubs from seven nations have won the title since 2015.
How does the FIBA Europe Cup playoff format work?
The top two teams from each of the 10 groups advance to two-legged quarter-finals. Winners progress through two-legged semi-finals, with the finals also contested over two legs, with aggregate scoring determining the champion.
What countries have won the FIBA Europe Cup?
Seven nations have produced FIBA Europe Cup champions: Spain (2 titles), Germany (2 titles), Poland (1 title), Turkey (1 title), Italy (2 titles), France (1 title), and Israel (1 title).
When was the FIBA Europe Cup first played?
The FIBA Europe Cup was established in 2015, with Fraport Skyliners of Germany winning the inaugural title. The competition was created as part of FIBA's restructuring of European club basketball.
API data: 6 May 2026 · Stats updated: 30 Apr 2026 · Content updated: 19 Mar 2026