1. Division · Season 2025
Match Events
Penalty
Match Statistics
Lineups
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for AEL is 6.86, compared to 6.54 for Enosis. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. AEL's highest-rated starter is C. Frantzis (7.27), while Enosis's best-rated player is P. Panagiotou (6.96).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of AEL have contributed 4 goals and 2 assists this season, led by A. Makris (3G). Enosis's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
AEL deploy 2 defenders rated 7.15 on average, against Enosis's 3-man backline averaging 6.54. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
AEL field 8 midfielders averaging 6.78, versus Enosis's 5 rated 6.43. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
AEL start 0 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for Enosis averaging 6.61. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 78% for AEL and 75% for Enosis. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
AEL's starters have collected 22 yellow cards this season, compared to 35 for Enosis. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of AEL's starting XI is 26.3 (youngest: P. Kyriakou (21), oldest: B. Z. Jradi (32)), while Enosis average 28.2 (youngest: J. Kazan (18), oldest: E. Sakic (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
AEL's starters average 18 league appearances each, versus 18 for Enosis. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: Hugo Martins
Substitutes
Coach: Damir Canadi
Match Summary
AEL defeated Enosis 2:1. The match was played in 1. Division 2025. Goals were scored by L. Singh 81′ (pen.), A. Makris 90′, A. Ella 90′. 3 yellow cards were shown. AEL had 65% possession while Enosis held 35%. AEL had 15 shots (3 on target) compared to 4 (1 on target) for Enosis. Expected goals: AEL 2.68 — Enosis 1.17. AEL made 5 substitutions, Enosis made 5.
AEL vs Enosis Head to Head Results
16 stretnutíRecent Meetings
Recent Form
AEL
Enosis
Match Prediction
AEL
45%
Home win
45%
Draw
Enosis
10%
Away win
Model advice
Winner : AEL
API data: 11 May 2026