31 October 2021 at 15:45
Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
Utrecht dominatesHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
3.6
Average goals per game
60%
Games with 3+ goals
50%
Both teams scored
Market Summary
Margin: 6.3%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 1.36 | 4.50 | 7.50 |
| Max | 1.39 | 4.92 | 8.98 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 69.6% | 19.7% | 10.8% |
| Public market | 68.1% | 19.5% | 12.4% |
| Δ | 1.4% | 0.1% | 1.6% |
Utrecht vs Willem II — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result matched market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Avg. odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2524/25 | Willem II | 2–3 | Utrecht | 3.97/3.39/1.95 |
| 21/09/2424/25 | Utrecht | 3–2 | Willem II | 1.57/4.12/5.59 |
| 15/05/2221/22 | Willem II | 3–0 | Utrecht | 2.16/3.78/3.01 |
| 31/10/2121/22 | Utrecht | 5–1 | Willem II | 1.37/4.72/8.33 |
| 01/05/2120/21 | Utrecht | 3–2 | Willem II | 1.49/4.41/6.51 |
| 19/02/2120/21 | Willem II | 0–6 | Utrecht | 5.78/4.71/1.51 |
| 16/02/2019/20 | Willem II | 1–1 | Utrecht | 2.55/3.55/2.60 |
| 29/09/1919/20 | Utrecht | 2–0 | Willem II | 1.51/4.33/6.11 |
| 27/01/1918/19 | Utrecht | 0–1 | Willem II | 1.44/4.59/6.76 |
| 28/10/1818/19 | Willem II | 0–1 | Utrecht | 2.75/3.37/2.51 |
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: Utrecht
Away Record: Willem II
Data: football-data.co.uk
Match Summary
Utrecht defeated Willem II 5:1. The match was played in Eredivisie 2021. Goals were scored by B. Ramselaar 10′, B. Ramselaar 25′, K. Wriedt 35′, B. Ramselaar 67′, M. Mallahi 83′, J. van Overeem 90′. 5 yellow cards were shown. Utrecht had 55% possession while Willem II held 45%. Utrecht had 19 shots (7 on target) compared to 9 (3 on target) for Willem II. Utrecht made 6 substitutions, Willem II made 4.
Match Events
Key match events between Utrecht and Willem II — 6 goals and 5 cards recorded during the match.
assist: M. Sylla
assist: C. Nunnely
assist: D. Warmerdam
assist: A. Douvikas
assist: R. Balk
Match Statistics
Utrecht had 55% possession against Willem II's 45%. Utrecht registered 19 shots (7 on target) while Willem II managed 9 (3 on target). Corner kicks: 4–5. Fouls committed: 9–16.
Lineups
Utrecht lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation under R. Hake, while Willem II deployed a 4-2-3-1 under F. Grim.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Utrecht is 7.07, compared to — for Willem II. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Utrecht's highest-rated starter is M. van der Hoorn (7.07), while Willem II's best-rated player is —.
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Utrecht have contributed 1 goals and 0 assists this season, led by M. van der Hoorn (1G). Willem II's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Utrecht deploy 4 defenders rated 7.07 on average, against Willem II's 4-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Utrecht field 5 midfielders averaging —, versus Willem II's 5 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Utrecht start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Willem II averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 84% for Utrecht and —% for Willem II. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Utrecht's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Willem II. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Utrecht's starting XI is 33.0 (youngest: M. van der Hoorn (33), oldest: M. van der Hoorn (33)), while Willem II average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Utrecht's starters average 25 league appearances each, versus 0 for Willem II. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: R. Hake
Substitutes
Coach: F. Grim
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Utrecht have recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 1 defeats. Willem II show 5 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.
Utrecht
Willem II
Utrecht vs Willem II Head to Head Results
Utrecht and Willem II have met 21 times — Utrecht won 14, Willem II won 5, with 2 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2010. Utrecht leads the head-to-head with 14 victories from 21 meetings. A combined 70 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 3.33 per match (45 for the home side, 25 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 11 matches (52%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 13 games (62%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 0–6 in 2021.
14
Utrecht
2
Drawn
5
Willem II
Recent Meetings (21)
API data: 15 Mar 2026