15 May 2022 at 12:30
Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
Utrecht dominatesHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
3.6
Average goals per game
60%
Games with 3+ goals
50%
Both teams scored
Potential Betting Value Detected
Historical win rate (20%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (44%) — the odds may underestimate Utrecht.
Market Summary
Margin: 6.0%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 2.15 | 3.50 | 3.00 |
| Max | 2.19 | 4.14 | 3.03 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 44.4% | 23.5% | 32.1% |
| Public market | 42.9% | 26.4% | 30.7% |
| Δ | 1.5% | 2.9% | 1.4% |
Willem II vs Utrecht — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result matched market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Avg. odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2524/25 | Willem II | 2–3 | Utrecht | 3.97/3.39/1.95 |
| 21/09/2424/25 | Utrecht | 3–2 | Willem II | 1.57/4.12/5.59 |
| 15/05/2221/22 | Willem II | 3–0 | Utrecht | 2.16/3.78/3.01 |
| 31/10/2121/22 | Utrecht | 5–1 | Willem II | 1.37/4.72/8.33 |
| 01/05/2120/21 | Utrecht | 3–2 | Willem II | 1.49/4.41/6.51 |
| 19/02/2120/21 | Willem II | 0–6 | Utrecht | 5.78/4.71/1.51 |
| 16/02/2019/20 | Willem II | 1–1 | Utrecht | 2.55/3.55/2.60 |
| 29/09/1919/20 | Utrecht | 2–0 | Willem II | 1.51/4.33/6.11 |
| 27/01/1918/19 | Utrecht | 0–1 | Willem II | 1.44/4.59/6.76 |
| 28/10/1818/19 | Willem II | 0–1 | Utrecht | 2.75/3.37/2.51 |
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: Willem II
Away Record: Utrecht
Data: football-data.co.uk
Match Summary
Willem II defeated Utrecht 3:0. The match was played in Eredivisie 2021. Goals were scored by J. Hornkamp 8′, D. Saddiki 53′, J. van Overeem 73′ (o.g.). 2 yellow cards were shown. Willem II had 44% possession while Utrecht held 56%. Willem II had 18 shots (6 on target) compared to 8 (3 on target) for Utrecht. Willem II made 5 substitutions, Utrecht made 5.
Match Events
Key match events between Willem II and Utrecht — 3 goals and 2 cards recorded during the match.
Own Goal
Match Statistics
Willem II had 44% possession against Utrecht's 56%. Willem II registered 18 shots (6 on target) while Utrecht managed 8 (3 on target). Corner kicks: 2–5. Fouls committed: 8–8.
Lineups
Willem II lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation under K. Hofland, while Utrecht deployed a 4-3-3 under R. Kruijs.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Willem II is —, compared to 7.07 for Utrecht. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Willem II's highest-rated starter is —, while Utrecht's best-rated player is M. van der Hoorn (7.07).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Willem II have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Utrecht's starters account for 1 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by M. van der Hoorn (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Willem II deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Utrecht's 4-man backline averaging 7.07. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Willem II field 5 midfielders averaging —, versus Utrecht's 3 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Willem II start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 3 for Utrecht averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages —% for Willem II and 84% for Utrecht. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Willem II's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Utrecht. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Willem II's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Utrecht average 33.0 (youngest: M. van der Hoorn (33), oldest: M. van der Hoorn (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Willem II's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 25 for Utrecht. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: K. Hofland
Substitutes
Coach: R. Kruijs
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Willem II have recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 1 defeats. Utrecht show 4 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.
Willem II
Utrecht
Willem II vs Utrecht Head to Head Results
Willem II and Utrecht have met 21 times — Willem II won 4, Utrecht won 15, with 2 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2010. Utrecht leads the head-to-head with 15 victories from 21 meetings. A combined 73 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 3.48 per match (23 for the home side, 50 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 12 matches (57%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 13 games (62%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. Utrecht are currently unbeaten in the last 7 meetings. The highest-scoring encounter finished 5–1 in 2021.
4
Willem II
2
Drawn
15
Utrecht
Recent Meetings (21)
API data: 15 Mar 2026