22 April 2023 at 14:00
Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
Even recordHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
2.2
Average goals per game
40%
Games with 3+ goals
40%
Both teams scored
Potential Betting Value Detected
Historical win rate (40%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (55%) — the odds may underestimate Gillingham.
Market Summary
Margin: 5.0%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 1.70 | 3.30 | 5.25 |
| Max | 1.75 | 3.36 | 6.50 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 55.2% | 28.8% | 16.0% |
| Public market | 56.3% | 29.0% | 14.7% |
| Δ | 1.0% | 0.2% | 1.3% |
Bradford vs Gillingham — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result differed from market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Avg. odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26/11/1111/12 | Gillingham | 0–0 | Bradford | 1.67/3.58/4.75 |
| 08/03/2524/25 | Gillingham | 1–0 | Bradford | 4.02/3.26/1.96 |
| 24/03/1211/12 | Bradford | 2–2 | Gillingham | 2.49/3.24/2.77 |
| 19/10/2424/25 | Bradford | 2–1 | Gillingham | 2.17/3.02/3.70 |
| 06/04/2423/24 | Bradford | 1–0 | Gillingham | 2.27/3.24/3.27 |
| 16/12/2323/24 | Gillingham | 0–2 | Bradford | 2.40/3.23/3.07 |
| 22/04/2322/23 | Bradford | 2–2 | Gillingham | 1.73/3.32/5.93 |
| 28/02/2322/23 | Gillingham | 0–2 | Bradford | 2.73/3.03/2.80 |
| 18/08/1212/13 | Gillingham | 3–1 | Bradford | 2.09/3.41/3.53 |
| 09/02/1312/13 | Bradford | 0–1 | Gillingham | 2.50/3.28/2.99 |
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: Bradford
Away Record: Gillingham
Data: football-data.co.uk
Match Summary
Bradford and Gillingham drew 2:2. The match was played in League Two 2022. Goals were scored by T. Dieng 12′, A. Cook 48′, A. Cook 84′ (pen.), O. Hawkins 90′. 4 yellow cards were shown. Bradford had 64% possession while Gillingham held 36%. Bradford had 14 shots (4 on target) compared to 15 (6 on target) for Gillingham. Bradford made 3 substitutions, Gillingham made 3.
Match Events
Key match events between Bradford and Gillingham — 4 goals and 4 cards recorded during the match.
assist: L. Ridehalgh
Penalty
Match Statistics
Bradford had 64% possession against Gillingham's 36%. Bradford registered 14 shots (4 on target) while Gillingham managed 15 (6 on target). Corner kicks: 6–8. Fouls committed: 9–13.
Lineups
Bradford lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation under M. Hughes, while Gillingham deployed a 4-4-1-1 under N. Harris.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Bradford is 6.77, compared to 6.90 for Gillingham. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Bradford's highest-rated starter is B. Halliday (6.83), while Gillingham's best-rated player is C. Masterson (6.97).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Bradford have contributed 0 goals and 1 assists this season, led by —. Gillingham's starters account for 6 goals and 2 assists, spearheaded by R. McKenzie (4G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Bradford deploy 4 defenders rated 6.83 on average, against Gillingham's 4-man backline averaging 6.93. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Bradford field 5 midfielders averaging —, versus Gillingham's 4 rated 6.88. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Bradford start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.70, compared to 2 for Gillingham averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 58% for Bradford and 65% for Gillingham. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Bradford's starters have collected 3 yellow cards this season, compared to 8 for Gillingham. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Bradford's starting XI is 32.5 (youngest: B. Halliday (30), oldest: A. Cook (35)), while Gillingham average 30.3 (youngest: E. Coleman (25), oldest: G. Morris (42)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Bradford's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 27 for Gillingham. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: M. Hughes
Substitutes
Coach: N. Harris
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Bradford have recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 defeats. Gillingham show 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses from their last 6 outings.
Bradford
Gillingham
API data: 16 Apr 2026