Menu

Waterford vs Shamrock Rovers

Regional Sports Centre, Waterford22 September 2025 at 19:45

Match Events

Waterford
Shamrock Rovers
Kick Off
Kacper Radkowski27′
28′
J. Honohan

assist: D. Cleary

James Olayinka39′
40′Cory O'Sullivan
Half Time
Samuel Glenfield49′
T. CoyleT. Lonergan
57′
Josh Miles68′
70′
D. MandroiuD. Watts
71′
J. McGovernG. Burke
71′
A. McEneffR. Gaffney
72′
M. Healy

assist: A. Matthews

Jesse Dempsey75′
J. DempseyK. White
81′
87′
J. HonohanS. Kavanagh
87′
M. HealyG. O'Neill
J. MilesM. Faal
88′
T. Lonergan
90′
Full Time

Match Statistics

2Shots on Goal5
4Shots off Goal4
10Total Shots14
4Blocked Shots5
7Shots insidebox8
3Shots outsidebox6
12Fouls10
5Corner Kicks5
0Offsides4
45%Ball Possession55%
5Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
4Goalkeeper Saves1
390Total passes488
304Passes accurate394
78%Passes %81%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Waterford is 6.70, compared to 6.99 for Shamrock Rovers. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Waterford's highest-rated starter is S. McMullan (7.68), while Shamrock Rovers's best-rated player is M. Healy (7.36).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Waterford have contributed 4 goals and 2 assists this season, led by P. Amond (3G). Shamrock Rovers's starters account for 8 goals and 6 assists, spearheaded by R. Lopes (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Waterford deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Shamrock Rovers's 3-man backline averaging 7.06. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Waterford field 4 midfielders averaging 6.41, versus Shamrock Rovers's 5 rated 6.90. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Waterford start 2 forward(s) averaging 6.51, compared to 2 for Shamrock Rovers averaging 6.82. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 55% for Waterford and 80% for Shamrock Rovers. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Waterford's starters have collected 5 yellow cards this season, compared to 15 for Shamrock Rovers. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Waterford's starting XI is 24.4 (youngest: J. Dempsey (20), oldest: P. Amond (37)), while Shamrock Rovers average 26.6 (youngest: C. O'Sullivan (19), oldest: R. Lopes (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Waterford's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 11 for Shamrock Rovers. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Waterford5-3-23-5-2Shamrock Rovers
GKDEFMIDFWD
1McMullan21Miles5Horton17Radkows.3Burke14Dempsey19Glenfie.24Rossiter8Olayinka99Coyle9Amond1McGinty6Cleary4Lopes27O'Sulli.3Matthews15Nugent17Healy8McEneff2Honohan14Mandroiu88McGovern

Substitutes

Coach: John Coleman

Substitutes

Coach: Stephen Bradley

WaterfordPosition StrengthShamrock Rovers
6.70
Avg Rating
6.99
7.68Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.11
0G 0A0G 0A
Defender (4 v 3)7.06
0G 0A3G 2A
6.41Midfielder (4 v 5)6.90
0G 0A2G 0A
6.51Forward (2 v 2)6.82
4G 2A3G 4A
Waterford5-3-2
1GoalkeeperS. McMullan7.7
21DefenderJ. Miles
5DefenderG. Horton
17DefenderK. Radkowski
3DefenderR. Burke
14MidfielderJ. Dempsey6.3
19MidfielderS. Glenfield6.6
24MidfielderJ. Rossiter
8MidfielderJ. Olayinka
99ForwardT. Coyle6.61G2A
9ForwardP. Amond6.43G
Shamrock Rovers3-5-2
1GoalkeeperE. McGinty7.1
6DefenderD. Cleary7.1
4DefenderR. Lopes7.23G
27DefenderC. O'Sullivan6.92A
3MidfielderA. Matthews6.4
15MidfielderD. Nugent
17MidfielderM. Healy7.42G
8MidfielderA. McEneff
2MidfielderJ. Honohan
14ForwardD. Mandroiu
88ForwardJ. McGovern6.83G4A

Match Summary

Shamrock Rovers defeated Waterford 2:1. The match was played in Premier Division 2025. Goals were scored by J. Honohan 28′, M. Healy 72′, T. Lonergan 90′. 6 yellow cards were shown. Waterford had 45% possession while Shamrock Rovers held 55%. Waterford had 10 shots (2 on target) compared to 14 (5 on target) for Shamrock Rovers. Waterford made 3 substitutions, Shamrock Rovers made 5.

Rivalry since 2019

Waterford vs Shamrock Rovers Head to Head Results

20 stretnutí
Waterford
2
wins
Drawn
1
Shamrock Rovers
17
wins
Total goals
63 · 3.1/match
Both scored
13/20 · 65%
Over 2.5
13/20 · 65%

Recent Form

Waterford

LDLDLD

Shamrock Rovers

WWWLWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026