Menu

Waterford vs Shelbourne

Regional Sports Centre, Waterford21 February 2025 at 19:45
01
Referee: P. Norton

Match Events

Waterford
Shelbourne
Kick Off
14′
A. Odubeko

assist: S. Boyd

45+1′Mark Coyle
Half Time
67′
K. McInroyJ. Lunney
67′
E. CaffreyA. Coote
T. LonerganM. Pouwels
77′
D. McMenamyK. White
77′
N. BakboordS. Glenfield
77′
78′
H. WoodJ. Norris
79′
M. CoyleE. Chapman
84′
S. BoydJ. Martin
R. McDonaldL. Roberts
87′
Full Time

Match Statistics

1Shots on Goal4
6Shots off Goal8
12Total Shots14
5Blocked Shots2
8Shots insidebox3
4Shots outsidebox11
12Fouls11
5Corner Kicks2
2Offsides5
35%Ball Possession65%
0Yellow Cards4
1Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves1
341Total passes655
242Passes accurate569
71%Passes %87%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Waterford is 6.96, compared to 6.96 for Shelbourne. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Waterford's highest-rated starter is S. McMullan (7.68), while Shelbourne's best-rated player is H. Wood (7.24).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Waterford have contributed 8 goals and 3 assists this season, led by T. Lonergan (4G). Shelbourne's starters account for 20 goals and 15 assists, spearheaded by H. Wood (9G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Waterford deploy 3 defenders rated — on average, against Shelbourne's 4-man backline averaging 6.89. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Waterford field 4 midfielders averaging 6.88, versus Shelbourne's 5 rated 7.07. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Waterford start 3 forward(s) averaging 6.75, compared to 1 for Shelbourne averaging 6.89. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 64% for Waterford and 48% for Shelbourne. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Waterford's starters have collected 6 yellow cards this season, compared to 48 for Shelbourne. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Waterford's starting XI is 24.8 (youngest: S. McMullan (21), oldest: P. Amond (37)), while Shelbourne average 26.7 (youngest: E. Caffrey (22), oldest: S. Gannon (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Waterford's starters average 13 league appearances each, versus 28 for Shelbourne. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Waterford3-4-1-24-4-2Shelbourne
GKDEFMIDFWD
1McMullan17Radkows.15Leahy4Boyle2Bakboord27McMenamy6McDonald3Burke20Noonan9Amond18Lonergan1Kearns2Gannon29Barrett15Bone4Ledwidge27Caffrey8Coyle23McInroy7Wood9Boyd11Odubeko

Substitutes

Coach: John Coleman

Substitutes

Coach: Joseph Martin O'Brien

WaterfordPosition StrengthShelbourne
6.96
Avg Rating
6.96
7.68Goalkeeper (1 v 1)6.93
0G 0A0G 0A
Defender (3 v 4)6.89
0G 0A1G 2A
6.88Midfielder (4 v 5)7.07
1G 1A12G 10A
6.75Forward (3 v 1)6.89
7G 2A7G 3A
Waterford3-4-1-2
1GoalkeeperS. McMullan7.7
17DefenderK. Radkowski
15DefenderD. Leahy
4DefenderA. Boyle
2MidfielderN. Bakboord
27MidfielderD. McMenamy6.91G1A
6MidfielderR. McDonald
3MidfielderR. Burke
20ForwardC. Noonan6.91A
9ForwardP. Amond6.43G
18ForwardT. Lonergan7.04G1A
Shelbourne4-4-2
1GoalkeeperC. Kearns6.9
2DefenderS. Gannon6.91A
29DefenderP. Barrett6.9
15DefenderS. Bone6.91G
4DefenderK. Ledwidge6.91A
27MidfielderE. Caffrey7.12G5A
8MidfielderM. Coyle6.91G1A
23MidfielderK. McInroy
7MidfielderH. Wood7.29G4A
9MidfielderS. Boyd
11ForwardA. Odubeko6.97G3A

Match Summary

Shelbourne defeated Waterford 1:0. The match was played in Premier Division 2025. Goals were scored by A. Odubeko 14′. 4 yellow cards were shown, 1 red card. Waterford had 35% possession while Shelbourne held 65%. Waterford had 12 shots (1 on target) compared to 14 (4 on target) for Shelbourne. Waterford made 4 substitutions, Shelbourne made 5.

Rivalry since 2020

Waterford vs Shelbourne Head to Head Results

12 stretnutí
Waterford
2
wins
Drawn
3
Shelbourne
7
wins
Total goals
26 · 2.2/match
Both scored
6/12 · 50%
Over 2.5
4/12 · 33%

Recent Form

Waterford

LDLDLD

Shelbourne

DLLLDW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026