Menu

Shelbourne vs Waterford

Tolka Park, Dublin26 September 2025 at 19:45
21

Match Events

Shelbourne
Waterford
Kick Off
A. Coote

assist: K. McInroy

7′
42′
C. Noonan

assist: J. Dempsey

Half Time
49′
S. GlenfieldT. Lonergan
59′
J. DempseyK. White
J. NorrisE. Caffrey
60′
M. MbengD. Kelly
60′
J. LunneyJ. Henry-Francis
68′
J. MartinA. Odubeko
68′
75′
J. MilesR. Mansfield
K. McInroyS. Boyd
77′
H. Wood

Penalty

79′
S. BoneS. Gannon
90+1′
90+1′
G. HortonM. Faal
Full Time

Match Statistics

5Shots on Goal3
6Shots off Goal3
13Total Shots10
2Blocked Shots4
11Shots insidebox7
2Shots outsidebox3
8Fouls15
3Corner Kicks4
5Offsides2
63%Ball Possession37%
2Yellow Cards4
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves3
510Total passes293
409Passes accurate177
80%Passes %60%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Shelbourne is 6.91, compared to 6.76 for Waterford. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Shelbourne's highest-rated starter is H. Wood (7.24), while Waterford's best-rated player is S. McMullan (7.68).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Shelbourne have contributed 23 goals and 8 assists this season, led by H. Wood (9G). Waterford's starters account for 3 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by P. Amond (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Shelbourne deploy 3 defenders rated 6.88 on average, against Waterford's 3-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Shelbourne field 4 midfielders averaging 6.90, versus Waterford's 4 rated 6.41. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Shelbourne start 3 forward(s) averaging 7.00, compared to 3 for Waterford averaging 6.66. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 50% for Shelbourne and 60% for Waterford. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Shelbourne's starters have collected 40 yellow cards this season, compared to 7 for Waterford. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Shelbourne's starting XI is 25.5 (youngest: J. Norris (22), oldest: P. Barrett (32)), while Waterford average 24.0 (youngest: S. Glenfield (20), oldest: P. Amond (37)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Shelbourne's starters average 26 league appearances each, versus 11 for Waterford. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Shelbourne3-4-2-13-4-2-1Waterford
GKDEFMIDFWD
13Speel15Bone29Barrett4Ledwidge25Mbeng6Lunney23McInroy18Norris7Wood14Coote10Martin1McMullan5Horton17Radkows.3Burke21Miles19Glenfie.24Rossiter14Dempsey20Noonan8Olayinka9Amond

Substitutes

Coach: Joseph Martin O'Brien

Substitutes

Coach: John Coleman

ShelbournePosition StrengthWaterford
6.91
Avg Rating
6.76
6.73Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.68
0G 0A0G 0A
6.88Defender (3 v 3)
1G 1A0G 0A
6.90Midfielder (4 v 4)6.41
1G 2A0G 0A
7.00Forward (3 v 3)6.66
21G 5A3G 1A
Shelbourne3-4-2-1
13GoalkeeperW. Speel6.7
15DefenderS. Bone6.91G
29DefenderP. Barrett6.9
4DefenderK. Ledwidge6.91A
25MidfielderM. Mbeng7.0
6MidfielderJ. Lunney6.91G1A
23MidfielderK. McInroy
18MidfielderJ. Norris6.81A
7ForwardH. Wood7.29G4A
14ForwardA. Coote6.95G
10ForwardJ. Martin6.87G1A
Waterford3-4-2-1
1GoalkeeperS. McMullan7.7
5DefenderG. Horton
17DefenderK. Radkowski
3DefenderR. Burke
21MidfielderJ. Miles
19MidfielderS. Glenfield6.6
24MidfielderJ. Rossiter
14MidfielderJ. Dempsey6.3
20ForwardC. Noonan6.91A
8ForwardJ. Olayinka
9ForwardP. Amond6.43G

Match Summary

Shelbourne defeated Waterford 2:1. The match was played in Premier Division 2025. Goals were scored by A. Coote 7′, C. Noonan 42′, H. Wood 79′ (pen.). 6 yellow cards were shown. Shelbourne had 63% possession while Waterford held 37%. Shelbourne had 13 shots (5 on target) compared to 10 (3 on target) for Waterford. Shelbourne made 6 substitutions, Waterford made 4.

Rivalry since 2020

Shelbourne vs Waterford Head to Head Results

12 stretnutí
Shelbourne
7
wins
Drawn
3
Waterford
2
wins
Total goals
24 · 2.0/match
Both scored
5/12 · 42%
Over 2.5
3/12 · 25%

Recent Form

Shelbourne

DLLLDW

Waterford

LDLDLD
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026