Match Summary
Al-Hazm defeated Al-Fateh 2:0. The match was played in Pro League 2023. Goals were scored by Bruno Viana 5′, Tozé 14′ (pen.). 4 yellow cards were shown. Al-Hazm had 45% possession while Al-Fateh held 55%. Al-Hazm had 15 shots (5 on target) compared to 11 (4 on target) for Al-Fateh. Al-Hazm made 3 substitutions, Al-Fateh made 4. VAR was involved: Goal confirmed (Bruno Viana 7′).
Match Events
Key match events between Al-Hazm and Al-Fateh — 2 goals and 4 cards recorded during the match.
assist: F. Selemani
Penalty
Match Statistics
Al-Hazm had 45% possession against Al-Fateh's 55%. Al-Hazm registered 15 shots (5 on target) while Al-Fateh managed 11 (4 on target). Corner kicks: 7–8. Fouls committed: 19–9.
Lineups
Al-Hazm lined up in a 4-3-1-2 formation under D. Carreño, while Al-Fateh deployed a 4-3-2-1 under S. Bilić.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Al-Hazm is —, compared to 6.85 for Al-Fateh. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Al-Hazm's highest-rated starter is —, while Al-Fateh's best-rated player is M. Saâdane (6.95).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Al-Hazm have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Al-Fateh's starters account for 6 goals and 2 assists, spearheaded by S. Bendebka (6G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Al-Hazm deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Al-Fateh's 4-man backline averaging 6.84. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Al-Hazm field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Al-Fateh's 5 rated 6.88. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Al-Hazm start 2 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Al-Fateh averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Discipline
Al-Hazm's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 11 for Al-Fateh. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Al-Hazm's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Al-Fateh average 30.3 (youngest: Saeed Baattia (25), oldest: M. Saâdane (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Al-Hazm's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 22 for Al-Fateh. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Al-Hazm have recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 3 defeats. Al-Fateh show 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses from their last 6 outings.
Al-Hazm
Al-Fateh
Head to Head
Al-Hazm and Al-Fateh have met 2 times — Al-Hazm won 0, Al-Fateh won 0, with 2 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. A combined 2 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 1.00 per match (1 for the home side, 1 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (50%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 0 games (0%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 1–1 in 2026.
0
Al-Hazm
2
Drawn
0
Al-Fateh
Recent Meetings (2)
API data: 15 Mar 2026