2 December 2021 at 11:00

Referee: D. Luca

Match Summary

Petrocub and Sheriff Tiraspol drew 0:0. The match was played in Super Liga 2021. 6 yellow cards were shown. Petrocub made 3 substitutions, Sheriff Tiraspol made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between Petrocub and Sheriff Tiraspol — 0 goals and 6 cards recorded during the match.

Petrocub
Sheriff Tiraspol
Kick Off
36′E. Addo
Half Time
59′
A. KhalidF. Castañeda
A. FedorovR. Bînzaru
61′
66′
M. YansaneBruno Souza
M. IosipoiV. Gulceac
80′
82′
D. KolovosN. Dago
V. AmbrosA. Graur
88′
M. Meira90+2′
Full Time

Lineups

Petrocub lined up in a — formation under L. Popescu, while Sheriff Tiraspol deployed a — under Y. Vernydub.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Petrocub is 7.13, compared to — for Sheriff Tiraspol. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Petrocub's highest-rated starter is S. Plătică (7.13), while Sheriff Tiraspol's best-rated player is —.

Midfield Control

Petrocub field 11 midfielders averaging 7.13, versus Sheriff Tiraspol's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 83% for Petrocub and —% for Sheriff Tiraspol. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Age & Experience

The average age of Petrocub's starting XI is 34.0 (youngest: S. Plătică (34), oldest: S. Plătică (34)), while Sheriff Tiraspol average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Petrocub's starters average 5 league appearances each, versus 0 for Sheriff Tiraspol. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

PetrocubPosition StrengthSheriff Tiraspol
7.13
Avg Rating
7.13Midfielder (11 v 11)
0G 1A0G 0A
Petrocub
1MidfielderMickaël Meira
90MidfielderI. Jardan
22MidfielderŞ. Efros
20MidfielderD. Douanla
19MidfielderM. Plătică
93MidfielderC. Sandu
97MidfielderM. Iosipoi
94MidfielderC. Cotogoi
13MidfielderA. Fedorov
11MidfielderS. Plătică7.11A
9MidfielderV. Ambros
Sheriff Tiraspol
30MidfielderG. Athanasiadis
15MidfielderCristiano
2MidfielderD. Arboleda
55MidfielderG. Dulanto
13MidfielderFernando Costanza
31MidfielderS. Thill
22MidfielderD. Kolovos
21MidfielderE. Addo
9MidfielderA. Traoré
7MidfielderA. Khalid
99MidfielderM. Yansane

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, Petrocub have recorded 5 wins, 0 draws and 1 defeats. Sheriff Tiraspol show 5 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses from their last 6 outings.

Petrocub

WWWWLW

Sheriff Tiraspol

WWDWWW

Petrocub vs Sheriff Tiraspol Head to Head Results

Petrocub and Sheriff Tiraspol have met 4 times — Petrocub won 1, Sheriff Tiraspol won 2, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. Sheriff Tiraspol leads the head-to-head with 2 victories from 4 meetings. A combined 9 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.25 per match (4 for the home side, 5 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (25%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (25%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 4–2 in 2025.

1

Petrocub

1

Drawn

2

Sheriff Tiraspol

Goals: 4Goals: 5

Recent Meetings (4)

14 Mar 2026Sheriff Tiraspol1 – 0Petrocub
8 Nov 2025Petrocub4 – 2Sheriff Tiraspol
14 Sept 2025Sheriff Tiraspol2 – 0Petrocub
20 Jul 2025Petrocub0 – 0Sheriff Tiraspol
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 6 Apr 2026