Menu

Chicago Fire vs Nashville Sc

Soldier Field, Chicago15 June 2025 at 01:30

Match Events

Chicago Fire
Nashville SC
Kick Off
Half Time
M. PinedaK. Acosta
46′
46′
J. BauerA. Najar
56′
H. Mukhtar

assist: A. Najar

64′
A. QasemJ. Perez
J. DeanL. Barroso
66′
M. Haile-SelassieT. Barlow
72′
76′
G. BrugmanP. Yazbek
90+4′Joe Willis
90+5′
E. TagsethM. Corcoran
Full Time

Match Statistics

7Shots on Goal3
5Shots off Goal6
14Total Shots11
2Blocked Shots2
12Shots insidebox7
2Shots outsidebox4
7Fouls19
9Corner Kicks4
3Offsides0
51%Ball Possession49%
2Yellow Cards5
0Red Cards0
1Goalkeeper Saves7
492Total passes470
421Passes accurate388
86%Passes %83%
1.67expected_goals1.16
1goals_prevented1

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Chicago Fire is 6.97, compared to 6.99 for Nashville SC. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Chicago Fire's highest-rated starter is H. Cuypers (7.85), while Nashville SC's best-rated player is S. Surridge (7.46).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Chicago Fire have contributed 18 goals and 6 assists this season, led by H. Cuypers (13G). Nashville SC's starters account for 14 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by S. Surridge (9G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Chicago Fire deploy 4 defenders rated 6.80 on average, against Nashville SC's 4-man backline averaging 7.05. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Chicago Fire field 5 midfielders averaging 6.87, versus Nashville SC's 4 rated 6.78. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Chicago Fire start 1 forward(s) averaging 7.85, compared to 2 for Nashville SC averaging 7.21. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 83% for Chicago Fire and 84% for Nashville SC. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Chicago Fire's starters have collected 9 yellow cards this season, compared to 14 for Nashville SC. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Chicago Fire's starting XI is 27.8 (youngest: S. Oregel (20), oldest: J. Gal (32)), while Nashville SC average 28.8 (youngest: A. Qasem (22), oldest: J. Willis (37)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Chicago Fire's starters average 8 league appearances each, versus 8 for Nashville SC. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Chicago Fire4-2-3-14-2-2-2Nashville SC
GKDEFMIDFWD
25Gal24Dean34Gonzalez3Elliott15Gutman35Oregel22Pineda7Haile-S.17Gutierr.19Bamba9Cuypers1Willis22Bauer4Palacios5Maher2Lovitz7Brugman20Tagseth37Qasem19Muyl10Mukhtar9Surridge

Substitutes

Coach: Mike Matkovich

Substitutes

Coach: Brian Joseph Callaghan II

Chicago FirePosition StrengthNashville SC
6.97
Avg Rating
6.99
6.80Defender (4 v 4)7.05
0G 3A0G 0A
6.87Midfielder (5 v 4)6.78
5G 3A2G 1A
7.85Forward (1 v 2)7.21
13G 0A12G 4A
Chicago Fire4-2-3-1
25GoalkeeperJ. Gal
24DefenderJ. Dean6.6
34DefenderO. Gonzalez
3DefenderJ. Elliott7.01A
15DefenderA. Gutman6.82A
35MidfielderS. Oregel6.7
22MidfielderM. Pineda6.7
7MidfielderM. Haile-Selassie7.03G1A
17MidfielderB. Gutierrez
19MidfielderJ. Bamba7.12G2A
9ForwardH. Cuypers7.813G
Nashville SC4-2-2-2
1GoalkeeperJ. Willis
22DefenderJ. Bauer6.8
4DefenderJ. Palacios7.4
5DefenderJ. Maher7.1
2DefenderD. Lovitz6.9
7MidfielderG. Brugman
20MidfielderE. Tagseth7.11G
37MidfielderA. Qasem6.71G1A
19MidfielderA. Muyl6.6
10ForwardH. Mukhtar7.03G4A
9ForwardS. Surridge7.59G

Match Summary

Nashville SC defeated Chicago Fire 2:0. The match was played in Major League Soccer 2025. Goals were scored by H. Mukhtar 56′, S. Surridge 75′. 7 yellow cards were shown. Chicago Fire had 51% possession while Nashville SC held 49%. Chicago Fire had 14 shots (7 on target) compared to 11 (3 on target) for Nashville SC. Expected goals: Chicago Fire 1.67 — Nashville SC 1.16. Chicago Fire made 3 substitutions, Nashville SC made 4.

Rivalry since 2020

Chicago Fire vs Nashville SC Head to Head Results

9 stretnutí
Chicago Fire
2
wins
Drawn
2
Nashville SC
5
wins
Total goals
26 · 2.9/match
Both scored
3/9 · 33%
Over 2.5
4/9 · 44%

Recent Form

Chicago Fire

WWLLLW

Nashville SC

WDLDLW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026