Challenge Cup — Today's Matches
Live scores, upcoming kick-offs, and finished results for today. Data refreshes automatically so you never miss a moment.
Challenge Cup — Team Stats
Side-by-side performance comparison of all 49 teams in the Challenge Cup. Dukla Prague leads with 5 wins this season. The colour-coded heatmap highlights wins, losses, scoring, scoring difference, and win percentage — making it easy to spot the strongest and weakest teams at a glance for betting analysis.
Top Scoring Teams
49 teams in the Challenge Cup 2025 season ranked by wins. Dukla Prague leads with 5 wins. Their 3-season average is 2.0 wins per season. Dukla Prague shows the biggest improvement this season with 3 more wins than their past average. Compare current form against historical averages to spot rising and declining teams — useful for match result and outright winner betting.
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Goals For | Goals Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played6 | 5 | Lost1 | Goals For191 | Goals Against146 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L2.7 | |
| 2 | Played6 | 4 | Lost0 | Goals For194 | Goals Against164 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 3 | Played6 | 4 | Lost1 | Goals For196 | Goals Against151 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 4 | Played6 | 4 | Lost1 | Goals For193 | Goals Against155 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 5 | Played6 | 4 | Lost2 | Goals For184 | Goals Against170 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 6 | Played4 | 3 | Lost0 | Goals For134 | Goals Against107 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L2.3 | |
| 7 | Played4 | 3 | Lost0 | Goals For119 | Goals Against107 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
8Odessa (Ukr)3Won | 8 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For119 | Goals Against89 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
| 9 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For111 | Goals Against85 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 10 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For115 | Goals Against102 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 11 | Played6 | 3 | Lost3 | Goals For182 | Goals Against174 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
12Madeira3Won | 12 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For111 | Goals Against103 | Avg W5.5 | Avg L1.5 |
| 13 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For107 | Goals Against100 | Avg W4.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 14 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For105 | Goals Against112 | Avg W2.5 | Avg L2.5 | |
| 15 | Played4 | 2 | Lost1 | Goals For139 | Goals Against135 | Avg W6.0 | Avg L4.0 | |
16Dobeles Tenax (Lat)2Won | 16 | Played4 | 2 | Lost1 | Goals For122 | Goals Against118 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
| 17 | Played4 | 2 | Lost1 | Goals For112 | Goals Against108 | Avg W9.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
18Granitas Kaunas (Ltu)2Won | 18 | Played4 | 2 | Lost1 | Goals For115 | Goals Against116 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 |
| 19 | Played4 | 2 | Lost2 | Goals For127 | Goals Against86 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
20Dicken (Fin)2Won | 20 | Played4 | 2 | Lost2 | Goals For135 | Goals Against97 | Avg W5.0 | Avg L2.0 |
| 21 | Played4 | 2 | Lost2 | Goals For111 | Goals Against101 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
22Kauno Azuolas (Ltu)2Won | 22 | Played4 | 2 | Lost2 | Goals For113 | Goals Against121 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L1.0 |
| 23 | Played4 | 1 | Lost2 | Goals For131 | Goals Against126 | Avg W1.6 | Avg L1.6 | |
| 24 | Played4 | 1 | Lost2 | Goals For119 | Goals Against115 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 25 | Played4 | 1 | Lost3 | Goals For121 | Goals Against113 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 26 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For52 | Goals Against53 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
27Zeleznicar (Srb)1Won | 27 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For58 | Goals Against61 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
| 28 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For52 | Goals Against55 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L2.5 | |
29Maribor1Won | 29 | Played4 | 1 | Lost3 | Goals For98 | Goals Against103 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
| 30 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For49 | Goals Against55 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 31 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For53 | Goals Against61 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 32 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Goals For53 | Goals Against67 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 33 | Played4 | 1 | Lost3 | Goals For104 | Goals Against126 | Avg W0.8 | Avg L1.8 | |
34Tiraspol (Mda)0Won | 34 | Played2 | 0 | Lost1 | Goals For50 | Goals Against59 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
| 35 | Played2 | 0 | Lost1 | Goals For50 | Goals Against59 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
36HC Tallinn (Est)0Won | 36 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For52 | Goals Against56 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 |
| 37 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For41 | Goals Against47 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 38 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For48 | Goals Against55 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L2.7 | |
| 39 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For55 | Goals Against63 | Avg W1.3 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 40 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For41 | Goals Against51 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 41 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For46 | Goals Against62 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L1.3 | |
| 42 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For55 | Goals Against72 | Avg W3.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
43Hurry-Up0Won | 43 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For47 | Goals Against69 | Avg W2.3 | Avg L2.3 |
| 44 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For49 | Goals Against78 | Avg W0.7 | Avg L2.0 | |
45Mahsul (Aze)0Won | 45 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For38 | Goals Against74 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
46Proodeftikos Paphos (Cyp)0Won | 46 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For35 | Goals Against72 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 |
47Olympia Handball0Won | 47 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For26 | Goals Against66 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 |
| 48 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For37 | Goals Against81 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
49Livingston (Eng)0Won | 49 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Goals For33 | Goals Against82 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 |
Challenge Cup — Past Seasons
Browse 8 archived seasons of the Challenge Cup, from 2018 to 2015. Each season page includes full standings, top scorers, and match results — useful for comparing historical performance and identifying long-term betting patterns.
History 16 Mar 2026
The EHF European Cup originated in 1993 as the EHF City Cup, a competition designed to provide opportunities for clubs beyond the elite tier of European handball. The competition underwent significant evolution when it was renamed the EHF Challenge Cup in 2000, reflecting its role as a stepping stone for ambitious clubs. In 2020, following a comprehensive restructuring of EHF club competitions, it was rebranded as the EHF European Cup, establishing its identity as the official third-tier competition. This rebranding coincided with the introduction of the EHF European League as the second-tier competition, creating a clearer pathway from domestic leagues through three tiers of continental competition. The tournament has consistently expanded its geographic reach, now incorporating teams from over 30 European nations and serving as a genuine pan-European competition.
- —1993 — EHF City Cup launched as a new third-tier European competition
- —2000 — Competition renamed to EHF Challenge Cup
- —2006 — Steaua Bucureşti claimed the title, establishing Eastern European dominance
- —2013 — Sporting CP won the title, marking Portugal's first victory
- —2020 — Rebranded as EHF European Cup as part of major EHF competition restructuring
- —2024 — RK Alkaloid became North Macedonia's first EHF European Cup champion
- —2025 — Expanded participation with 74 teams from 30+ nations competing
Competition Format 16 Mar 2026
The EHF European Cup operates as a knockout competition with a distinctive two-leg tie format, where teams compete in home-and-away matches to determine advancement. The competition structure begins with qualifying rounds for lower-ranked federations, progressively narrowing the field through successive knockout stages until reaching the final. Teams are seeded based on their federation's EHF ranking, ensuring that stronger competitions receive favorable draws. The final is contested as a single match or two-leg aggregate depending on the specific season format, providing a dramatic conclusion to the competition. This knockout structure differs fundamentally from group-stage competitions, creating intense, direct encounters that determine progression.
Records 16 Mar 2026
The 2024-25 final saw RK Alkaloid defeat AEK Athens 29-25 in the first leg, with Athens unable to contest the second leg, marking Alkaloid's historic first-ever title and North Macedonia's debut victory in the competition.
Analysis 16 Mar 2026
Current Season Analysis
The Dukla Prague concluded with a historic championship as Stavropol of North Macedonia claimed their first-ever title, defeating AEK Athens in a dramatic final. The Macedonian club's triumph represents a watershed moment for the competition, demonstrating its role in elevating emerging handball nations to continental prominence. Alkaloid's 29-25 victory in the first leg proved decisive when Athens withdrew from the second leg, handing the trophy to the Balkan side and establishing them as the competition's newest champions. This victory follows a pattern of competitive diversification, with recent seasons seeing champions emerge from Iceland, Serbia, and North Macedonia rather than traditional handball powerhouses.
The competition showcased remarkable geographic breadth in the 2024-25 campaign, with 74 teams from over 30 European nations participating across multiple qualifying rounds and knockout stages. The tournament structure, operating through successive two-leg ties, created intense encounters that tested the depth and consistency of participating clubs. Teams from smaller federations demonstrated competitive capability against more established handball nations, validating the EHF European Cup's purpose as a genuine pan-European competition rather than a secondary tier dominated by elite clubs seeking additional silverware.
AEK Athens' presence in the final underscored the Greek federation's growing strength in European club handball. The Athens club's journey to the final represented one of the most compelling narratives of the season, though their inability to contest the second leg in the final proved costly. This situation highlighted the organizational and logistical challenges sometimes faced by clubs from smaller federations competing at the highest European levels, yet their qualification for the final itself demonstrated genuine competitive merit.
The Competition's Role in European Handball Development
The EHF European Cup occupies a distinctive position within the continental club handball landscape. Operating as the third tier below the EHF Champions League and EHF European League, it provides a crucial developmental pathway for ambitious clubs seeking to establish themselves in European competition. Unlike the elite Champions League, which predominantly features clubs from the strongest handball federations, the European Cup creates genuine opportunities for teams from emerging handball nations to compete and win at continental level.
The competition's evolution from the EHF City Cup through the Challenge Cup to its current European Cup identity reflects broader changes in European handball administration and commercial strategy. The 2020 rebranding coincided with the establishment of the EHF European League as a dedicated second-tier competition, creating a more structured three-tier system. This reorganization clarified the pathway for club development and provided greater clarity for federations and clubs seeking to compete in European competitions.
Geographic Diversification and Competitive Balance
Recent championship winners illustrate the EHF European Cup's success in fostering competitive balance across diverse European regions. The last three champions—RK Alkaloid (North Macedonia, 2024-25), Valur (Iceland, 2023-24), and RK Vojvodina (Serbia, 2022-23)—represent three distinct nations and demonstrate that the competition genuinely rewards quality and ambition rather than serving as an automatic platform for established clubs. This pattern contrasts sharply with the Champions League, where Spanish, German, and French dominance has been consistent.
CS UCM Reşiţa of Romania remains the most successful team in the competition's history with three titles, establishing themselves during the Challenge Cup era. However, even this achievement pales in comparison to the dominance some clubs exercise in national leagues, suggesting that the European Cup's knockout format and competitive breadth prevent any single team from establishing sustained continental supremacy at this level.
Broadcasting and Global Reach
The EHF European Cup maintains broadcast presence across 30+ European territories through EHFTV, the official European Handball Federation streaming platform, complemented by regional broadcasting partnerships. This distribution infrastructure ensures that matches reach dedicated handball audiences across the continent, though the competition receives considerably less media attention than the Champions League. The streaming-first approach reflects modern broadcasting trends and provides accessibility to international audiences while maintaining strong regional broadcast partnerships in key handball markets.
Hummel's role as the official apparel supplier and EHF Marketing GmbH's management of commercial rights establish the competition's professional infrastructure. However, the European Cup typically generates less commercial revenue than the elite Champions League or second-tier European League, reflecting its position within the EHF's competition hierarchy and the reduced commercial appeal of teams from smaller federations.
Structural Significance and Future Outlook
The EHF European Cup's knockout format creates a distinctive competitive character distinct from group-stage competitions. Two-leg ties require teams to demonstrate consistency across multiple matches while managing travel and fixture congestion. This format tests adaptability and resilience, often favoring well-organized clubs with strong administrative structures over those relying solely on individual talent.
Looking forward, the competition's trajectory will likely continue reflecting broader patterns in European handball development. As emerging nations invest in club handball infrastructure and development programs, the European Cup may increasingly feature competitive clubs from Scandinavia's smaller nations, the Balkans, and Eastern Europe. The tournament's role as a developmental pathway ensures its continued relevance within the EHF's competition structure, providing clubs with genuine opportunities to compete at continental level and establish themselves as serious European contenders.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the EHF European Cup?
The EHF European Cup is the third-tier club handball competition in Europe, contested by approximately 74 teams from over 30 nations. It was formerly known as the EHF Challenge Cup until its rebranding in 2020.
How many teams compete in the EHF European Cup?
Approximately 74 teams from over 30 European nations participate in the competition, with the exact number varying by season based on federation participation and qualifying procedures.
What is the competition format?
The EHF European Cup operates as a knockout competition featuring two-leg ties (home-and-away matches). Teams are seeded based on their federation's EHF ranking, with qualifying rounds narrowing the field through successive knockout stages until the final.
Which team has won the most EHF European Cup titles?
CS UCM Reşiţa from Romania holds the record with 3 titles won in the competition's history, establishing themselves as the most successful team in the tournament.
When was the EHF European Cup founded?
The competition was founded in 1993 as the EHF City Cup, renamed to EHF Challenge Cup in 2000, and rebranded as the EHF European Cup in 2020 as part of a comprehensive restructuring of EHF club competitions.
How is the EHF European Cup broadcast?
The competition is distributed through EHFTV, the official EHF streaming platform, alongside regional broadcasting partnerships across 30+ European territories. Major matches and finals receive extensive coverage.
API data: 24 Apr 2026 · Content updated: 16 Mar 2026