WCH U18 IB — Today's Matches
Live scores, upcoming kick-offs, and finished results for today. Data refreshes automatically so you never miss a moment.
WCH U18 IB — Results
The latest 15 completed matches in the WCH U18 IB. The highest-scoring result was Lithuania U18 7–4 South Korea U18. Review recent scorelines to spot form trends, home advantage patterns, and upset results that can inform your next bet.
| Home | Score | Away | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 – 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-19P1: 0–4P2: 2–1P3: 1–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-19P1: 1–0P2: 4–0P3: 0–3FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-19P1: 1–0P2: 1–0P3: 0–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-18P1: 1–1P2: 0–1P3: 1–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-18P1: 2–1P2: 0–1P3: 1–1OT: 0–0SO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-18P1: 0–1P2: 3–0P3: 1–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-16P1: 3–1P2: 0–0P3: 1–0FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-16P1: 1–2P2: 1–0P3: 0–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-16P1: 2–1P2: 0–1P3: 1–1OT: 0–0SO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 – 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 – 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-14P1: 0–2P2: 4–1P3: 3–1FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-14P1: 1–0P2: 0–3P3: 0–2FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-14P1: 0–0P2: 1–1P3: 1–0FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-13P1: 1–0P2: 4–0P3: 2–0FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-13P1: 1–2P2: 2–0P3: 0–0FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-04-13P1: 1–1P2: 2–0P3: 1–0FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WCH U18 IB — Team Stats
Side-by-side performance comparison of all 6 teams in the WCH U18 IB. Poland U18 leads with 3 wins this season. The colour-coded heatmap highlights wins, losses, draws, goals scored and conceded, goal difference, and win percentage — making it easy to spot the strongest and weakest teams at a glance for betting analysis.
WCH U18 IB — Betting Insights
WCH U18 IB 2025 — key betting statistics across 15 matches played. Games average 6.13 goals, with 93.3% seeing both teams score and 53.3% finishing with over 5.5 goals. Home sides win 73.3% of the time while % of matches end in a draw. Clean sheets are kept in 6.7% of games, and the most common scoreline is 4-1. Use these metrics to calibrate over/under, BTTS, and correct-score strategies.
Most Common Scorelines
The most frequent final scores in this competition — useful for correct score betting.
WCH U18 IB — Season Trends
Season-by-season comparison across 10 seasons of the WCH U18 IB, with 2025 highlighted. The current season averages 6.13 goals per match across 15 matches played. Columns cover home win %, away win %, BTTS rate, clean sheets, and over/under percentages — use year-on-year trends to spot if the league is becoming higher or lower scoring and calibrate your betting strategy accordingly.
Most Common Scorelines
The most frequent final scores in this competition — useful for correct score betting.
Period Goals & Game Patterns
Goal distribution by period and key game patterns — overtime, shootouts and comeback wins.
Top Scoring Teams
6 teams in the WCH U18 IB 2025 season ranked by wins. Poland U18 leads with 3 wins. Their 2-season average is 0.5 wins per season. Poland U18 shows the biggest improvement this season with 3 more wins than their past average. Compare current form against historical averages to spot rising and declining teams — useful for match result and outright winner betting.
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Goals For | Goals Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played5 | 3 | Lost1 | Goals For19 | Goals Against12 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L4.5 | |
| 2 | Played5 | 3 | Lost2 | Goals For21 | Goals Against14 | Avg W3.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 3 | Played5 | 3 | Lost2 | Goals For21 | Goals Against16 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L3.0 | |
| 4 | Played5 | 2 | Lost2 | Goals For12 | Goals Against12 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L3.0 | |
| 5 | Played5 | 1 | Lost3 | Goals For8 | Goals Against20 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L3.5 | |
| 6 | Played5 | 1 | Lost3 | Goals For11 | Goals Against18 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
WCH U18 IB — Past Seasons
Browse 8 archived seasons of the WCH U18 IB, from 2016 to 2025. Each season page includes full standings, top scorers, and match results — useful for comparing historical performance and identifying long-term betting patterns.
History 20 Apr 2025
The IIHF World U18 Championship was established in 1999 to provide international competition for under-18 ice hockey players and has evolved into a multi-tiered tournament system. Division I was introduced to accommodate nations with developing ice hockey programs, creating a competitive environment between the elite Top Division and the lower divisions. The Division I structure was further refined with Group A and Group B subdivisions to balance competitive levels and reduce travel costs. The Division I Group B tournament has become a vital platform for nations like Lithuania, Poland, Estonia, and France to test their junior talent against international opposition while competing for promotion opportunities. The tournament's format and participating nations have shifted over the years to reflect the changing landscape of international ice hockey development.
- —1999 — IIHF World U18 Championship first held in Finland
- —2002 — Division I structure introduced to accommodate more participating nations
- —2010 — Division I Group A and Group B format established for better competitive balance
- —2025 — Poland U18 wins Division I Group B tournament in Kaunas, Lithuania with dominant performance
Competition Format 20 Apr 2025
The Division I Group B tournament operates as a single round-robin competition where each of the six teams plays every other team once, resulting in five matches per team over the tournament week. Teams earn three points for a win and one point for a loss in overtime or shootout. The winner of the tournament is promoted to Division I Group A for the following year, while the last-place team is relegated to Division II. The tournament typically runs for seven days with matches played at a central venue, allowing for intense competition and high-scoring encounters characteristic of youth ice hockey.
Records 20 Apr 2025
The 2025 tournament produced 92 total goals across 15 matches, averaging 6.13 goals per game, with both teams scoring in 93.3% of all matches.
Analysis 20 Apr 2025
Current Season Analysis (2025)
Poland U18 claimed the Division I Group B title in dominant fashion at the Kaunas Ice Palace tournament held from April 13-19, 2025. The Polish team finished with a commanding 3-1 record and 11 points, establishing themselves as the clear tournament favorites from the opening matches. Poland's attacking prowess was evident throughout the competition, as they accumulated 19 goals across their five matches while maintaining a respectable defensive record with 12 goals conceded, resulting in a ++7 goal.
The title race saw Lithuania U18 emerge as Poland's closest challenger, finishing second with a 3-2 record and 9 points. The hosts demonstrated competitive resilience, scoring 21 goals—the tournament's highest total—despite conceding 14. Lithuania's offensive firepower matched Poland's, but inconsistency in crucial moments cost them the title. South Korea U18 also posted a 3-2 record and 9 points, placing third on goal difference (+5), with an explosive 7-0 victory over Estonia U18 serving as the tournament's highlight and largest margin of victory.
The relegation battle intensified as Estonia U18 and Japan U18 struggled significantly. Estonia finished fifth with just one win from five matches, scoring only 8 goals while conceding 20, a stark -12 goal difference that left them vulnerable to demotion. Japan, the sixth-place finisher, managed only one victory in five attempts with 11 goals for and 18 against. The comprehensive 7-0 defeat to South Korea was particularly damaging, highlighting the gulf in preparation and execution between the tournament's elite teams and those struggling to compete at this level.
France U18 provided an interesting middle ground, finishing fourth with a 2-2 record and 7 points, posting a balanced 12-12 goal differential. The French squad demonstrated competitive balance but lacked the consistency needed to challenge for the title. The tournament's scoring patterns were notable, with an average of 6.13 goals per match, and both teams finding the net in 93.3% of all games, indicating wide-open, offensive-oriented play characteristic of youth ice hockey development tournaments.
Tournament Format and Competitive Structure
The Division I Group B tournament operates on a simplified yet effective single round-robin format, with each team playing five matches over seven days. This condensed schedule creates an intense competition where momentum and consistency prove decisive. The three-point system for wins and one point for overtime losses encourages attacking hockey while still rewarding competitive efforts in close contests. With only six participating teams, the tournament provides each nation with an adequate sample of matches to evaluate their development trajectory and identify areas for improvement at the international level.
The geographic and competitive diversity of the 2025 participant pool—spanning Eastern Europe (Poland, Lithuania, Estonia), Western Europe (France), and Asia (South Korea, Japan)—reflects the IIHF's commitment to developing ice hockey globally. The tournament serves as a critical proving ground where nations can test their junior development systems against international opposition without the pressure of the elite Top Division. Success in Division I Group B can lead to promotion and increased visibility, while struggles may result in demotion to Division II, creating meaningful stakes for all participants.
Standout Performances and Key Trends
Poland U18's tournament-winning campaign was built on defensive solidity and efficient offense. Their ability to convert opportunities while maintaining discipline—evidenced by a respectable 5-goal differential despite facing competitive opponents—suggests a well-coached, fundamentally sound team. The Polish squad's consistency across all five matches, avoiding any losses in regulation, demonstrated the hallmark of championship-caliber youth hockey: the ability to perform under pressure in a high-stakes environment.
South Korea U18's 7-0 demolition of Estonia U18 was the tournament's most striking result, showcasing the explosive offensive potential that characterizes their style of play. The 7-goal output in a single match represented 33% of South Korea's total tournament scoring (21 goals), indicating a feast-or-famine offensive approach. This inconsistency, despite a respectable 3-2 record, suggests that while South Korea possesses elite talent capable of dominating lesser opponents, they struggle against teams with superior defensive systems and goaltending.
The tournament's overall scoring trends—averaging 6.13 goals per game with 92 total goals across 15 matches—indicate that defensive systems in youth hockey remain a work in progress. The high prevalence of both teams scoring (93.3% of matches) reflects the reality that goaltending at the U18 level is still developing, with many young netminders lacking the positional discipline and consistency of their senior counterparts. This trend is consistent with youth hockey development philosophy, where offensive skill development often precedes defensive maturity.
Implications for National Development Programs
The 2025 Division I Group B results provide valuable insights into each nation's ice hockey development trajectory. Poland's victory signals the country's emergence as a competitive force in European youth hockey, with their well-rounded team performance suggesting a sustainable development model. Lithuania's strong second-place finish, particularly at home in Kaunas, reinforces their position as a regional power and demonstrates the benefits of hosting tournaments in terms of crowd support and player familiarity with the venue.
France U18's fourth-place finish and balanced goal differential suggest a team in transition, with sufficient talent to compete at this level but lacking the consistency to challenge for titles. Their development trajectory will be closely watched as they seek to improve their standing in future tournaments. Estonia U18 faces the most critical juncture, with their poor showing raising questions about their competitive depth and the effectiveness of their junior development system. The massive goal differential (-12) and single win from five matches indicates significant gaps in either offensive execution or defensive structure.
Japan U18's participation in the tournament represents an important step in Asia's ice hockey development, though their fifth-place finish and limited offensive output (11 goals) suggest they remain in the early stages of building a competitive program. The experience gained from competing against established European programs, however, provides invaluable learning opportunities for Japanese hockey development. South Korea U18, despite finishing tied on points with Lithuania, faces questions about consistency and whether their explosive offensive moments can be sustained against more defensively disciplined opponents.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many teams compete in the WCH U18 Division I Group B?
Six national under-18 teams compete in the Division I Group B tournament, playing each other once in a round-robin format.
What happens to the winner of the Division I Group B tournament?
The winner is promoted to Division I Group A for the following year's IIHF World U18 Championship.
Is there relegation in the WCH U18 Division I Group B?
Yes, the last-place team is relegated to Division II for the next tournament.
How is the tournament winner determined?
Teams earn three points for a win and one point for an overtime loss. The team with the most points after the round-robin is crowned champion.
Which teams participated in the 2025 Division I Group B tournament?
Poland U18, Lithuania U18, South Korea U18, France U18, Estonia U18, and Japan U18 competed in the 2025 tournament held in Kaunas.
How often is the WCH U18 Championship held?
The IIHF World U18 Championship is held annually, with Division I Group B tournaments typically taking place in April.
API data: 1 May 2026 · Stats updated: 1 May 2026 · Content updated: 20 Apr 2025