Menu

Velez Sarsfield vs Gimnasia L P

Match Events

Velez Sarsfield
Gimnasia L.P.
Kick Off
13′
M. Torres

Penalty

Half Time
R. AliendroM. Pellegrini
46′
VAR
52′Card upgrade
57′
A. MaxM. Melluso
57′
P. Silva TorrejonR. Giampaoli
L. RobertoneD. Valdes
71′
76′
M. TorresM. Panaro
76′
M. SeoaneB. Barros Schelotto
J. GarciaD. Godoy
81′
88′
A. AuzmendiG. Errecalde
Full Time

Match Statistics

5Shots on Goal3
10Shots off Goal2
27Total Shots7
12Blocked Shots2
16Shots insidebox3
11Shots outsidebox4
9Fouls13
17Corner Kicks0
2Offsides1
71%Ball Possession29%
2Yellow Cards5
0Red Cards1
2Goalkeeper Saves5
521Total passes232
429Passes accurate152
82%Passes %66%
1.39expected_goals1.02
0.63goals_prevented0.63

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Velez Sarsfield is 6.77, compared to 6.91 for Gimnasia L.P.. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Velez Sarsfield's highest-rated starter is E. Mammana (7.17), while Gimnasia L.P.'s best-rated player is German Conti (7.04).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Velez Sarsfield have contributed 4 goals and 3 assists this season, led by M. Lanzini (3G). Gimnasia L.P.'s starters account for 14 goals and 10 assists, spearheaded by M. Torres (8G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Velez Sarsfield deploy 4 defenders rated 6.76 on average, against Gimnasia L.P.'s 4-man backline averaging 6.98. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Velez Sarsfield field 5 midfielders averaging 6.80, versus Gimnasia L.P.'s 4 rated 6.91. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Velez Sarsfield start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.50, compared to 2 for Gimnasia L.P. averaging 6.71. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 43% for Velez Sarsfield and 76% for Gimnasia L.P.. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Velez Sarsfield's starters have collected 24 yellow cards this season, compared to 35 for Gimnasia L.P.. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Velez Sarsfield's starting XI is 28.6 (youngest: T. Andrada (18), oldest: R. Aliendro (34)), while Gimnasia L.P. average 27.8 (youngest: M. Seoane (21), oldest: N. Fernandez (35)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Velez Sarsfield's starters average 12 league appearances each, versus 14 for Gimnasia L.P.. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Velez Sarsfield4-2-3-14-3-1-2Gimnasia L.P.
GKDEFMIDFWD
12Montero4Garcia2Mammana16Magallan3Gomez5Baeza8Roberto.50Andrada22Lanzini29Aliendro23Monzon23Insfran25Steimba.13Conti21Martinez24Torrejon5Miramon16Max18Seoane8Fernand.32Torres29Auzmendi

Substitutes

Coach: Guilermo Barros Schelotto

Substitutes

Coach: Mariano Messera

Velez SarsfieldPosition StrengthGimnasia L.P.
6.77
Avg Rating
6.91
6.95Goalkeeper (1 v 1)6.97
0G 0A0G 0A
6.76Defender (4 v 4)6.98
1G 0A2G 4A
6.80Midfielder (5 v 4)6.91
3G 3A2G 3A
6.50Forward (1 v 2)6.71
0G 0A10G 3A
Velez Sarsfield4-2-3-1
12GoalkeeperA. Montero7.0
4DefenderJ. Garcia6.3
2DefenderE. Mammana7.2
16DefenderL. Magallan6.81G
3DefenderE. Gomez6.7
5MidfielderC. Baeza6.81A
8MidfielderL. Robertone
50MidfielderT. Andrada6.6
22MidfielderM. Lanzini7.03G1A
29MidfielderR. Aliendro6.81A
23ForwardF. Monzon6.5
Gimnasia L.P.4-3-1-2
23GoalkeeperN. Insfran7.0
25DefenderA. Steimbach7.03A
13DefenderGerman Conti7.0
21DefenderE. Martinez7.02G
24DefenderP. Silva Torrejon6.91A
5MidfielderI. Miramon7.0
16MidfielderA. Max7.01A
18MidfielderM. Seoane6.7
8MidfielderN. Fernandez7.02G2A
32ForwardM. Torres6.78G1A
29ForwardA. Auzmendi6.72G2A

Match Summary

Gimnasia L.P. defeated Velez Sarsfield 1:0. The match was played in Liga Profesional Argentina 2026. Goals were scored by M. Torres 13′ (pen.). 7 yellow cards were shown, 1 red card. Velez Sarsfield had 71% possession while Gimnasia L.P. held 29%. Velez Sarsfield had 27 shots (5 on target) compared to 7 (3 on target) for Gimnasia L.P.. Expected goals: Velez Sarsfield 1.39 — Gimnasia L.P. 1.02. Velez Sarsfield made 3 substitutions, Gimnasia L.P. made 5. VAR was involved: Card upgrade (Enzo Martínez 52′).

Rivalry since 2015

Velez Sarsfield vs Gimnasia L.P. Head to Head Results

16 stretnutí
Velez Sarsfield
5
wins
Drawn
4
Gimnasia L.P.
7
wins
Total goals
38 · 2.4/match
Both scored
6/16 · 38%
Over 2.5
7/16 · 44%

Recent Form

Velez Sarsfield

LDLLWL

Gimnasia L.P.

LWWWWW

Match Prediction

Velez Sarsfield

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Gimnasia L.P.

45%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : draw or Gimnasia L.P.

33%Form67%
50%Attack50%
40%Defence60%
40%Head-to-head60%

Bookmaker Odds

13 bookmakers

Best price

Velez Sarsfield

2.07

Betano

Draw

3.30

10Bet

Gimnasia L.P.

4.55

10Bet

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 17 May 2026