League Two · Season 2015
Match Events
assist: L. Taylor
assist: D. Fitzpatrick
Lineups
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Notts County is —, compared to 6.74 for AFC Wimbledon. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Notts County's highest-rated starter is —, while AFC Wimbledon's best-rated player is J. Reeves (6.74).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Notts County have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. AFC Wimbledon's starters account for 1 goals and 3 assists, spearheaded by J. Reeves (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Midfield Control
Notts County field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus AFC Wimbledon's 11 rated 6.74. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages —% for Notts County and 78% for AFC Wimbledon. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Notts County's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 9 for AFC Wimbledon. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Notts County's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while AFC Wimbledon average 32.0 (youngest: J. Reeves (32), oldest: J. Reeves (32)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Notts County's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 38 for AFC Wimbledon. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Match Summary
AFC Wimbledon defeated Notts County 2:0. The match was played in League Two 2015. Goals were scored by T. Elliott 9′, A. Barcham 83′. Notts County made 2 substitutions, AFC Wimbledon made 3.
Notts County vs AFC Wimbledon Head to Head Results
7 stretnutíRecent Meetings
Recent Form
Notts County
AFC Wimbledon
Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
AFC Wimbledon dominatesHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
2.7
Average goals per game
33%
Games with 3+ goals
33%
Both teams scored
Market Summary
Margin: 3.6%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 2.50 | 3.50 | 2.62 |
| Max | 2.76 | 3.60 | 2.70 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 35.4% | 27.4% | 37.3% |
| Public market | 37.0% | 27.0% | 36.0% |
| Δ | 1.6% | 0.3% | 1.3% |
Notts County vs AFC Wimbledon — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result differed from market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Avg. odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2524/25 | AFC Wimbledon | 2–0 | Notts County | 2.46/3.13/2.96 |
| 19/10/2424/25 | Notts County | 1–0 | AFC Wimbledon | 2.44/3.43/2.79 |
| 09/03/2423/24 | Notts County | 0–2 | AFC Wimbledon | 2.20/3.66/3.08 |
| 25/11/2323/24 | AFC Wimbledon | 4–2 | Notts County | 2.48/3.61/2.65 |
| 19/09/1515/16 | AFC Wimbledon | 2–1 | Notts County | 2.27/3.45/3.28 |
| 23/01/1615/16 | Notts County | 0–2 | AFC Wimbledon | 2.63/3.56/2.67 |
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: Notts County
Away Record: AFC Wimbledon
Data: football-data.co.uk
API data: 11 May 2026