Menu

New England Revolution vs Colorado Rapids

Gillette Stadium, Foxborough29 June 2025 at 00:30

Match Events

New England Revolution
Colorado Rapids
Kick Off
T. ChancalayL. Langoni
40′
40′
Rafael Navarro

assist: D. Yapi

Half Time
55′
T. Ku-DiPietro

assist: D. Yapi

S. Vines

Own Goal

58′
L. CampanaM. Urruti
63′
B. ByeI. Feingold
63′
68′
T. Ku-DiPietroS. Bassett
74′
S. VinesK. Rosenberry
74′
D. YapiC. Ronan
W. OmsbergT. Beason
81′
P. MillerL. Diaz
81′
C. Gil

Penalty

86′
90′
C. HarrisI. Murphy
Full Time

Match Statistics

10Shots on Goal4
3Shots off Goal1
18Total Shots10
5Blocked Shots5
11Shots insidebox4
7Shots outsidebox6
9Fouls15
11Corner Kicks2
1Offsides1
72%Ball Possession28%
2Yellow Cards3
0Red Cards0
1Goalkeeper Saves8
585Total passes241
514Passes accurate171
88%Passes %71%
2.21expected_goals0.81
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for New England Revolution is 6.89, compared to 6.83 for Colorado Rapids. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. New England Revolution's highest-rated starter is C. Gil (7.56), while Colorado Rapids's best-rated player is N. Defreitas-Hansen (7.22).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of New England Revolution have contributed 13 goals and 3 assists this season, led by C. Gil (5G). Colorado Rapids's starters account for 12 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by Rafael Navarro (8G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

New England Revolution deploy 3 defenders rated 6.60 on average, against Colorado Rapids's 4-man backline averaging 6.58. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

New England Revolution field 4 midfielders averaging 6.82, versus Colorado Rapids's 4 rated 6.62. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

New England Revolution start 3 forward(s) averaging 7.28, compared to 2 for Colorado Rapids averaging 6.97. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 82% for New England Revolution and 83% for Colorado Rapids. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

New England Revolution's starters have collected 7 yellow cards this season, compared to 13 for Colorado Rapids. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of New England Revolution's starting XI is 26.0 (youngest: P. Miller (18), oldest: C. Gil (33)), while Colorado Rapids average 23.8 (youngest: D. Yapi (21), oldest: R. Cannon (27)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

New England Revolution's starters average 8 league appearances each, versus 9 for Colorado Rapids. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

New England Revolution3-4-1-24-4-2Colorado Rapids
GKDEFMIDFWD
31Ivacic3Ceballos16Omsberg5Hughes15Bye8Polster80Yusuf25Miller10Gil9Campana7Chancal.41Defreit.4Cannon5Maxso6Awaziem3Vines14Harris8Larraz12Atencio21Ku-DiPi.9Navarro77Yapi

Substitutes

Coach: Pablo Moreira

Substitutes

Coach: Christopher Armas

New England RevolutionPosition StrengthColorado Rapids
6.89
Avg Rating
6.83
Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.22
0G 0A0G 0A
6.60Defender (3 v 4)6.58
2G 0A0G 0A
6.82Midfielder (4 v 4)6.62
5G 0A1G 0A
7.28Forward (3 v 2)6.97
6G 3A11G 5A
New England Revolution3-4-1-2
31GoalkeeperA. Ivacic
3DefenderB. Ceballos7.32G
16DefenderW. Omsberg
5DefenderK. Hughes5.9
15MidfielderB. Bye
8MidfielderM. Polster6.6
80MidfielderA. Yusuf7.12G
25MidfielderP. Miller6.83G
10ForwardC. Gil7.65G3A
9ForwardL. Campana7.01G
7ForwardT. Chancalay
Colorado Rapids4-4-2
41GoalkeeperN. Defreitas-Hansen7.2
4DefenderR. Cannon6.6
5DefenderA. Maxso
6DefenderC. Awaziem
3DefenderS. Vines
14MidfielderC. Harris
8MidfielderO. Larraz
12MidfielderJ. Atencio6.71G
21MidfielderT. Ku-DiPietro6.6
9ForwardRafael Navarro7.28G3A
77ForwardD. Yapi6.83G2A

Match Summary

New England Revolution and Colorado Rapids drew 3:3. The match was played in Major League Soccer 2025. Goals were scored by C. Harris 29′, Rafael Navarro 40′, T. Ku-DiPietro 55′, S. Vines 58′ (o.g.), C. Gil 86′ (pen.), M. Urruti 90′. 5 yellow cards were shown. New England Revolution had 72% possession while Colorado Rapids held 28%. New England Revolution had 18 shots (10 on target) compared to 10 (4 on target) for Colorado Rapids. Expected goals: New England Revolution 2.21 — Colorado Rapids 0.81. New England Revolution made 5 substitutions, Colorado Rapids made 4.

Rivalry since 2012

New England Revolution vs Colorado Rapids Head to Head Results

10 stretnutí
New England Revolution
7
wins
Drawn
0
Colorado Rapids
3
wins
Total goals
24 · 2.4/match
Both scored
5/10 · 50%
Over 2.5
6/10 · 60%

Recent Form

New England Revolution

WLWWLD

Colorado Rapids

LWLLDL
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026