Menu

Orlando City Sc vs New England Revolution

Inter&Co Stadium, Orlando, Florida11 May 2025 at 00:30

Match Events

Orlando City SC
New England Revolution
Kick Off
M. Ojeda

assist: J. Gerbet

33′
Half Time
Penalty confirmed53′
VAR
M. Ojeda

Penalty

55′
J. GerbetD. Thorhallsson
69′
70′
M. FofanaW. Omsberg
70′
T. BeasonL. Diaz
L. MurielD. McGuire
73′
I. AnguloR. Enrique
74′
85′
C. Gil

Penalty

R. SchlegelRafael Santos
87′
87′
P. MillerW. Sands
88′
I. FeingoldB. Bye
90+1′
I. GanagoK. Hughes
Full Time

Match Statistics

8Shots on Goal6
8Shots off Goal3
22Total Shots15
6Blocked Shots6
17Shots insidebox13
5Shots outsidebox2
10Fouls15
6Corner Kicks3
1Offsides1
47%Ball Possession53%
4Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves5
382Total passes421
321Passes accurate353
84%Passes %84%
2.78expected_goals2.37
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Orlando City SC is 6.83, compared to 7.03 for New England Revolution. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Orlando City SC's highest-rated starter is M. Ojeda (7.41), while New England Revolution's best-rated player is C. Gil (7.56).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Orlando City SC have contributed 11 goals and 4 assists this season, led by M. Ojeda (9G). New England Revolution's starters account for 15 goals and 3 assists, spearheaded by C. Gil (5G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Orlando City SC deploy 4 defenders rated 6.66 on average, against New England Revolution's 3-man backline averaging 7.10. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Orlando City SC field 5 midfielders averaging 6.95, versus New England Revolution's 5 rated 6.99. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Orlando City SC start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for New England Revolution averaging 7.00. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 84% for Orlando City SC and 83% for New England Revolution. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Orlando City SC's starters have collected 8 yellow cards this season, compared to 9 for New England Revolution. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Orlando City SC's starting XI is 27.8 (youngest: M. Pasalic (25), oldest: R. Jansson (34)), while New England Revolution average 26.0 (youngest: P. Miller (18), oldest: C. Gil (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Orlando City SC's starters average 11 league appearances each, versus 9 for New England Revolution. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Orlando City SC4-2-3-13-5-2New England Revolution
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Gallese30Freeman15Schlegel6Jansson4Brekalo5Araujo35Gerbet87Pasalic10Ojeda77Angulo9Muriel31Ivacic3Ceballos2Fofana4Beason12Feingold8Polster10Gil80Yusuf25Miller17Ganago9Campana

Substitutes

Coach: Óscar Alexander Pareja Gómez

Substitutes

Coach: Pablo Moreira

Orlando City SCPosition StrengthNew England Revolution
6.83
Avg Rating
7.03
6.66Defender (4 v 3)7.10
0G 0A3G 0A
6.95Midfielder (5 v 5)6.99
11G 4A11G 3A
Forward (1 v 2)7.00
0G 0A1G 0A
Orlando City SC4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperP. Gallese
30DefenderA. Freeman
15DefenderR. Schlegel
6DefenderR. Jansson6.8
4DefenderD. Brekalo6.5
5MidfielderC. Araujo
35MidfielderJ. Gerbet
87MidfielderM. Pasalic6.52G
10MidfielderM. Ojeda7.49G
77MidfielderI. Angulo6.94A
9ForwardL. Muriel
New England Revolution3-5-2
31GoalkeeperA. Ivacic
3DefenderB. Ceballos7.32G
2DefenderM. Fofana7.21G
4DefenderT. Beason6.8
12MidfielderI. Feingold6.91G
8MidfielderM. Polster6.6
10MidfielderC. Gil7.65G3A
80MidfielderA. Yusuf7.12G
25MidfielderP. Miller6.83G
17ForwardI. Ganago
9ForwardL. Campana7.01G

Match Summary

Orlando City SC and New England Revolution drew 3:3. The match was played in Major League Soccer 2025. Goals were scored by M. Ojeda 24′, M. Ojeda 33′, A. Yusuf 38′, M. Polster 44′, M. Ojeda 55′ (pen.), C. Gil 85′ (pen.). 5 yellow cards were shown. Orlando City SC had 47% possession while New England Revolution held 53%. Orlando City SC had 22 shots (8 on target) compared to 15 (6 on target) for New England Revolution. Expected goals: Orlando City SC 2.78 — New England Revolution 2.37. Orlando City SC made 4 substitutions, New England Revolution made 5. VAR was involved: Penalty confirmed (Joran Gerbet 53′).

Rivalry since 2015

Orlando City SC vs New England Revolution Head to Head Results

24 stretnutí
Orlando City SC
8
wins
Drawn
7
New England Revolution
9
wins
Total goals
98 · 4.1/match
Both scored
19/24 · 79%
Over 2.5
22/24 · 92%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 34 v 2026

Recent Form

Orlando City SC

DWLWWL

New England Revolution

WLWWLD
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026